Read time: 2.3 min.
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH I HATE IT HERE
The best HR advice comes from those in the trenches. That’s what this is: real-world HR insights delivered in a newsletter from Hebba Youssef, a Chief People Officer who’s been there. Practical, real strategies with a dash of humor. Because HR shouldn’t be thankless—and you shouldn’t be alone in it.
{{First Name | My friend}},
At some point, a familiar moment surfaces in most leadership teams.
Something isn't moving the way it should.
The strategy is sound. The team is capable. Yet, execution is stalling in ways nobody fully anticipated when the decision was made.
So the search for an explanation begins.
When the strategy gets the blame
For some leaders, the explanation lives in the strategy itself.
If execution isn't producing what was intended, maybe the direction needs revisiting. Maybe the priorities weren't articulated clearly enough. Maybe the competitive positioning needs a fresh look.
So the leadership team goes back to the strategy.
The conversation is thoughtful. The analysis is rigorous. And in many cases, something gets refined or sharpened as a result.
But the execution problem doesn't go away.
Because the strategy was never the source of it.
When the team gets the blame
For other leaders, the explanation lies in the people.
If execution is stalling, maybe the communication needs to improve. Maybe two leaders need to get better aligned. Maybe the friction between functions needs a facilitated conversation to clear the air.
So, the focus shifts to the interpersonal dynamic.
The conversations are genuine. The intent is real. And in many cases, something improves as a result.
But the execution problem doesn't go away.
Because interpersonal dynamics were never the source of it.
What both diagnoses miss
Neither explanation is unreasonable.
A strategy that isn't producing results deserves scrutiny. A dynamic between two leaders that is creating friction deserves attention. Both are legitimate leadership responses to visible symptoms.
But symptoms point to sources. And when the source is misidentified, the solution addresses something real without addressing what is actually driving the problem.
The strategy may be sound. The team may be strong. The interpersonal dynamic may have improved. And execution can still stall.
Because the problem isn't above the decision layer or below it.
It's inside it.
The decision layer is the space between strategy and execution. It is where decisions have to be made, carried, and sustained by the people responsible for moving them through the organization. And it is governed by structural conditions that determine whether those decisions advance cleanly or keep returning to the room.
When those conditions aren't in place, execution stalls. Everything above it and below it can be intact. What breaks down is the decision layer, the system responsible for moving decisions through the organization.
The question worth sitting with
Think about the last time your leadership team reached for an explanation when execution stalled.
Which diagnosis did you reach for first?
If the answer is pointing you somewhere you haven't looked yet, I'd welcome the conversation. You can schedule time directly here.
Until Next Sunday,
Shawnette Rochelle, MBA, PCC
Founder, Excellence Unbounded
Decision Architecture for Executive Teams
If you’re curious to learn more about my work with executive teams, you can find it here.


